Changeset 25090 in main
- Timestamp:
- 04/21/22 14:14:54 (4 months ago)
- Location:
- adopters/nm-epht/trunk/src/main/webapps/nmepht-content/xml/metadata
- Files:
-
- 13 edited
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
-
adopters/nm-epht/trunk/src/main/webapps/nmepht-content/xml/metadata/PrevalenceAnencephaly.xml
r11544 r25090 5 5 <citeinfo> 6 6 <origin>New Mexico EPHTN Project Manager</origin> 7 <pubdate>20 110518</pubdate>7 <pubdate>20210914</pubdate> 8 8 <title>Prevalence of Anencephaly per 10,000 Live Births </title> 9 9 <onlink/> … … 11 11 </citation> 12 12 <descript> 13 <abstract>This data set supports calculation of the frequency ("prevalence") of infants born with birth defect, which is anencephaly per number of live births among New Mexico residents. Prevalence of anencephaly is the number of live-born infants with anencephaly per 10,000 live-born infants. The prevalence of anencephaly per 10,000 live births measure is presented by county, for 1998-2007.</abstract>13 <abstract>This data set supports calculation of the frequency ("prevalence") of infants born with birth defect, which is anencephaly per number of live births among New Mexico residents. Prevalence of anencephaly is the number of live-born infants with anencephaly per 10,000 live-born infants. The prevalence of anencephaly per 10,000 live births measure is presented by county, for 2015-2019.</abstract> 14 14 <purpose>Dataset was created to provide data for the New Mexico Environmental Public Health Tracking Network in order to monitor spatial and temporal variation in the annual prevalence of anencephaly, one of the major birth defects consistent with Nationally Consistent Data and Measures (NCDMs.</purpose> 15 <supplinf>The data are from the New Mexico Birth Defects and Surveillance System (NM BDPASS). In January 2000 birth defects became a reportable condition; however, birth defects were collected prior to this date. Our first year of consistent data is 1998. Data are collected on births occurring in-state to NM residents. We do not currently receive births for NM residents which occur out of state. NM BDPASS collects birth defect data among live births as well as fetal losses, which include stillbirths, spontaneous abortions and elective terminations occurring at all gestational ages. Birth defect cases are ascertained up to age 4; however, the majority of diagnoses are made by age 1. Surveillance methods include a combination of active and passive case ascertainment. Case finding/identification occurs through review of birth and death certificates, hospital discharge diagnoses, records from pediatric specialists and prenatal diagnostic providers. The birth defects coding system is ICD-9-CM, supplemented with the CDC-BPA coding system for specific diagnoses. 16 The following International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes were used to identify anencephaly: 740.0 - 740.10. In 1987, CDC put forth a set of 6 digit codes (the sixth digit provides greater specificity for diagnosis) based on the British Pediatric Association Classification of Diseases and the ICD-9-CM. If CDC/BPA codes are present, the following were used to identify anencephaly: 740.000 - 740.100.</supplinf> 15 <supplinf>The data are from the New Mexico Birth Defects and Surveillance System (NM BDPASS). In January 2000 birth defects became a reportable condition; however, birth defects were collected prior to this date. Our first year of consistent data is 1998. Data are collected on births occurring in-state to NM residents. We do not currently receive births for NM residents which occur out of state. NM BDPASS collects birth defect data among live births as well as fetal losses, which include stillbirths, spontaneous abortions and elective terminations occurring at all gestational ages. Birth defect cases are ascertained up to age 4; however, the majority of diagnoses are made by age 1. Surveillance methods include a combination of active and passive case ascertainment. Case finding/identification occurs through review of birth and death certificates, hospital discharge diagnoses, records from pediatric specialists and prenatal diagnostic providers. 16 The following International Classification of Diseases, 9th and 10th Revisions Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM) codes were used in 2015 to identify anencephaly: 740.0 - 740.1 and Q00.00 - Q00.1, respectively. Only ICD-10-CM code was used from 2016-2019. 17 In 1987, CDC put forth a set of 6-digit codes (the sixth digit provides greater specificity for diagnosis) based on the British Pediatric Association Classification of Diseases and the ICD-9-CM. If CDC/BPA codes are present, the following were used to identify anencephaly: 740.00 - 740.10.</supplinf> 17 18 </descript> 18 19 <timeperd> 19 20 <timeinfo> 20 21 <rngdates> 21 <begdate> 19980101</begdate>22 <begdate>20150101</begdate> 22 23 <begtime/> 23 <enddate>20 071231</enddate>24 <enddate>20191231</enddate> 24 25 <endtime/> 25 26 </rngdates> … … 48 49 <themekey>740.0-740.10</themekey> 49 50 </theme> 51 <theme> 52 <themekt>ICD-10-CM</themekt> 53 <themekey>Q00.0-Q00.1</themekey> 54 </theme> 50 55 <place> 51 56 <placekt>FIPS 5-2 (State)</placekt> … … 67 72 <city>Santa Fe</city> 68 73 <state>NM</state> 69 <postal>8750 2</postal>74 <postal>87505</postal> 70 75 <country>United States Of America</country> 71 76 </cntaddr> … … 92 97 <procstep> 93 98 <procdesc>Dataset developed per the instructions found in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Recommendations for Nationally Consistent Data and Measures within the Environmental Public Health Tracking Network, version 1.3, (http://ephtracking.cdc.gov/docs/CDC_NCDM_Pt1_1.3.pdf). </procdesc> 94 <procdate>201 10518</procdate>99 <procdate>20160203</procdate> 95 100 </procstep> 96 101 <procstep> … … 120 125 rgis.unm.edu) or other servers hosted at UNM Earth Data Analysis Center. 121 126 </procdesc> 122 <procdate>201 20417</procdate>127 <procdate>20170920</procdate> 123 128 </procstep></lineage> 124 129 </dataqual> … … 147 152 <city>Santa Fe</city> 148 153 <state>NM</state> 149 <postal>8750 2</postal>154 <postal>87505</postal> 150 155 <country>United States Of America</country> 151 156 </cntaddr> … … 166 171 </distinfo> 167 172 <metainfo> 168 <metd>20 110518</metd>173 <metd>20210914</metd> 169 174 <metc> 170 175 <cntinfo> … … 179 184 <city>Santa Fe</city> 180 185 <state>NM</state> 181 <postal>8750 2</postal>186 <postal>87505</postal> 182 187 <country>United States Of America</country> 183 188 </cntaddr> … … 191 196 </cntinfo> 192 197 </metc> 193 <metstdn>EPHTN Tracking Network Profile Version 1.2</metstdn>198 <metstdn>EPHTN Tracking Network Profile Version 3.0</metstdn> 194 199 <metac>None</metac> 195 200 <metuc>None</metuc> -
adopters/nm-epht/trunk/src/main/webapps/nmepht-content/xml/metadata/PrevalenceCleftLipCleftPalate.xml
r22873 r25090 5 5 <citeinfo> 6 6 <origin>New Mexico EPHTN Project Manager</origin> 7 <pubdate>20 110518</pubdate>7 <pubdate>20210914</pubdate> 8 8 <title>Prevalence of Cleft Lip with or without Cleft Palate per 10,000 Live Births</title> 9 9 <onlink/> … … 11 11 </citation> 12 12 <descript> 13 <abstract>This data set supports calculation of the frequency ("prevalence") of infants born with birth defect, which is cleft lip with or w/o cleft palate per number of live births among New Mexico residents. Prevalence of cleft lip with or w/o cleft palate is the number of live-born infants with cleft lip with or w/o cleft palate per 10,000 live-born infants. The prevalence of cleft lip with or w/o cleft palate per 10,000 live births measure is presented by county, for 1998-2007.</abstract>13 <abstract>This data set supports calculation of the frequency ("prevalence") of infants born with birth defect, which is cleft lip with or w/o cleft palate per number of live births among New Mexico residents. Prevalence of cleft lip with or w/o cleft palate is the number of live-born infants with cleft lip with or w/o cleft palate per 10,000 live-born infants. The prevalence of cleft lip with or w/o cleft palate per 10,000 live births measure is presented by county, for 2015-2019.</abstract> 14 14 <purpose>Dataset was created to provide data for the New Mexico Environmental Public Health Tracking Network in order to monitor spatial and temporal variation in the annual prevalence of cleft lip with or w/o cleft palate, one of the major birth defects consistent with Nationally Consistent Data and Measures (NCDMs).</purpose> 15 <supplinf>The data are from the New Mexico Birth Defects and Surveillance System (NM BDPASS). In January 2000 birth defects became a reportable condition; however, birth defects were collected prior to this date. Our first year of consistent data is 1998. Data are collected on births occurring in-state to NM residents. We do not currently receive births for NM residents which occur out of state. NM BDPASS collects birth defect data among live births as well as fetal losses, which include stillbirths, spontaneous abortions and elective terminations occurring at all gestational ages. Birth defect cases are ascertained up to age 4; however, the majority of diagnoses are made by age 1. Surveillance methods include a combination of active and passive case ascertainment. Case finding/identification occurs through review of birth and death certificates, hospital discharge diagnoses, records from pediatric specialists and prenatal diagnostic providers. The birth defects coding system is ICD-9-CM, supplemented with the CDC-BPA coding system for specific diagnoses. 16 The following International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes were used to identify cleft lip with or without cleft palate: 749.1 - 749.14 or 749.2-749.25. In 1987, CDC put forth a set of 6 digit codes (the sixth digit provides greater specificity for diagnosis) based on the British Pediatric Association Classification of Diseases and the ICD-9-CM. If CDC/BPA codes are present, the following were used to identify cleft lip with or without cleft palate: 749.100 - 749.190 or 749.200 - 749.220 or 749.290. </supplinf> 15 <supplinf>The data are from the New Mexico Birth Defects and Surveillance System (NM BDPASS). In January 2000 birth defects became a reportable condition; however, birth defects were collected prior to this date. Our first year of consistent data is 1998. Data are collected on births occurring in-state to NM residents. We do not currently receive births for NM residents which occur out of state. NM BDPASS collects birth defect data among live births as well as fetal losses, which include stillbirths, spontaneous abortions and elective terminations occurring at all gestational ages. Birth defect cases are ascertained up to age 4; however, the majority of diagnoses are made by age 1. Surveillance methods include a combination of active and passive case ascertainment. Case finding/identification occurs through review of birth and death certificates, hospital discharge diagnoses, records from pediatric specialists and prenatal diagnostic providers. 16 The following International Classification of Diseases, 9th and 10th Revisions Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM) codes were used in 2015 to identify cleft lip with or without cleft palate: 749.1, 749.2, Q36.0-Q36.9, and Q37.0-Q37.9, respectively. Only ICD-10-CM code was used from 2016-2019. 17 In 1987, CDC put forth a set of 6-digit codes (the sixth digit provides greater specificity for diagnosis) based on the British Pediatric Association Classification of Diseases and the ICD-9-CM. If CDC/BPA codes are present, the following were used to identify cleft lip with or without cleft palate: 749.10 - 749.19 or 749.20 - 749.29. </supplinf> 17 18 </descript> 18 19 <timeperd> 19 20 <timeinfo> 20 21 <rngdates> 21 <begdate> 19980101</begdate>22 <begdate>20150101</begdate> 22 23 <begtime/> 23 <enddate>20 071231</enddate>24 <enddate>20191231</enddate> 24 25 <endtime/> 25 26 </rngdates> … … 47 48 <theme> 48 49 <themekt>ICD-9-CM</themekt> 49 <themekey>749.1-749.14, 749.2-749.25</themekey> 50 <themekey>749.1, 749.2</themekey> 51 </theme> 52 <theme> 53 <themekt>ICD-10-CM</themekt> 54 <themekey>Q36.0-Q36.9, Q37.0-Q37.9</themekey> 50 55 </theme> 51 56 <place> … … 68 73 <city>Santa Fe</city> 69 74 <state>NM</state> 70 <postal>8750 2</postal>75 <postal>87505</postal> 71 76 <country>United States Of America</country> 72 77 </cntaddr> … … 93 98 <procstep> 94 99 <procdesc>Dataset developed per the instructions found in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Recommendations for Nationally Consistent Data and Measures within the Environmental Public Health Tracking Network, version 1.3, (http://ephtracking.cdc.gov/docs/CDC_NCDM_Pt1_1.3.pdf). </procdesc> 95 <procdate>201 10518</procdate>100 <procdate>20160203</procdate> 96 101 </procstep> 97 102 <procstep> … … 121 126 rgis.unm.edu) or other servers hosted at UNM Earth Data Analysis Center. 122 127 </procdesc> 123 <procdate>201 20417</procdate>128 <procdate>20170920</procdate> 124 129 </procstep></lineage> 125 130 </dataqual> … … 148 153 <city>Santa Fe</city> 149 154 <state>NM</state> 150 <postal>8750 2</postal>155 <postal>87505</postal> 151 156 <country>United States Of America</country> 152 157 </cntaddr> … … 167 172 </distinfo> 168 173 <metainfo> 169 <metd>20 110518</metd>174 <metd>20210914</metd> 170 175 <metc> 171 176 <cntinfo> … … 180 185 <city>Santa Fe</city> 181 186 <state>NM</state> 182 <postal>8750 2</postal>187 <postal>87505</postal> 183 188 <country>United States Of America</country> 184 189 </cntaddr> … … 192 197 </cntinfo> 193 198 </metc> 194 <metstdn>EPHTN Tracking Network Profile Version 1.2</metstdn>199 <metstdn>EPHTN Tracking Network Profile Version 3.0</metstdn> 195 200 <metac>None</metac> 196 201 <metuc>None</metuc> -
adopters/nm-epht/trunk/src/main/webapps/nmepht-content/xml/metadata/PrevalenceCleftPalate.xml
r11544 r25090 5 5 <citeinfo> 6 6 <origin>New Mexico EPHTN Project Manager</origin> 7 <pubdate>201 10518</pubdate>7 <pubdate>20190914</pubdate> 8 8 <title>Prevalence of Cleft Palate without Cleft Lip per 10,000 Live Births </title> 9 9 <onlink/> … … 11 11 </citation> 12 12 <descript> 13 <abstract>This data set supports calculation of the frequency ("prevalence") of infants born with birth defect, which is cleft palate w/o cleft lip per number of live births among New Mexico residents. Prevalence of cleft palate w/o cleft lip is the number of live-born infants with cleft palate w/o cleft lip per 10,000 live-born infants. The prevalence of cleft palate w/o cleft lip per 10,000 live births measure is presented by county, for 1998-2007.</abstract>13 <abstract>This data set supports calculation of the frequency ("prevalence") of infants born with birth defect, which is cleft palate w/o cleft lip per number of live births among New Mexico residents. Prevalence of cleft palate w/o cleft lip is the number of live-born infants with cleft palate w/o cleft lip per 10,000 live-born infants. The prevalence of cleft palate w/o cleft lip per 10,000 live births measure is presented by county, for 2015-2019.</abstract> 14 14 <purpose>Dataset was created to provide data for the New Mexico Environmental Public Health Tracking Network in order to monitor spatial and temporal variation in the annual prevalence of cleft palate w/o cleft lip, one of the major birth defects consistent with Nationally Consistent Data and Measures (NCDMs).</purpose> 15 <supplinf>The data are from the New Mexico Birth Defects and Surveillance System (NM BDPASS). In January 2000 birth defects became a reportable condition; however, birth defects were collected prior to this date. Our first year of consistent data is 1998. Data are collected on births occurring in-state to NM residents. We do not currently receive births for NM residents which occur out of state. NM BDPASS collects birth defect data among live births as well as fetal losses, which include stillbirths, spontaneous abortions and elective terminations occurring at all gestational ages. Birth defect cases are ascertained up to age 4; however, the majority of diagnoses are made by age 1. Surveillance methods include a combination of active and passive case ascertainment. Case finding/identification occurs through review of birth and death certificates, hospital discharge diagnoses, records from pediatric specialists and prenatal diagnostic providers. The birth defects coding system is ICD-9-CM, supplemented with the CDC-BPA coding system for specific diagnoses. 16 The following International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes were used to identify cleft palate without cleft lip: 749.0 - 749.04 In 1987, CDC put forth a set of 6 digit codes (the sixth digit provides greater specificity for diagnosis) based on the British Pediatric Association Classification of Diseases and the ICD-9-CM. If CDC/BPA codes are present, the following were used to identify cleft palate without cleft lip: 749.000 - 749.090.</supplinf> 15 <supplinf>The data are from the New Mexico Birth Defects and Surveillance System (NM BDPASS). In January 2000 birth defects became a reportable condition; however, birth defects were collected prior to this date. Our first year of consistent data is 1998. Data are collected on births occurring in-state to NM residents. We do not currently receive births for NM residents which occur out of state. NM BDPASS collects birth defect data among live births as well as fetal losses, which include stillbirths, spontaneous abortions and elective terminations occurring at all gestational ages. Birth defect cases are ascertained up to age 4; however, the majority of diagnoses are made by age 1. Surveillance methods include a combination of active and passive case ascertainment. Case finding/identification occurs through review of birth and death certificates, hospital discharge diagnoses, records from pediatric specialists and prenatal diagnostic providers. 16 The following International Classification of Diseases, 9th and 10th Revisions Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM) codes were used in 2015 to identify cleft palate without cleft lip: 749.0 and Q35.1 - Q35.9, respectively. Only ICD-10-CM code was used from 2016-2019. 17 In 1987, CDC put forth a set of 6-digit codes (the sixth digit provides greater specificity for diagnosis) based on the British Pediatric Association Classification of Diseases and the ICD-9-CM. If CDC/BPA codes are present, the following were used to identify cleft palate without cleft lip: 749.00 - 749.09.</supplinf> 17 18 </descript> 18 19 <timeperd> 19 20 <timeinfo> 20 21 <rngdates> 21 <begdate> 19980101</begdate>22 <begdate>20150101</begdate> 22 23 <begtime/> 23 <enddate>20 071231</enddate>24 <enddate>20191231</enddate> 24 25 <endtime/> 25 26 </rngdates> … … 48 49 <theme> 49 50 <themekt>ICD-9-CM</themekt> 50 <themekey>749.0-749.04</themekey> 51 <themekey>749.0</themekey> 52 </theme> 53 <theme> 54 <themekt>ICD-10-CM</themekt> 55 <themekey>Q35.1-Q35.9</themekey> 51 56 </theme> 52 57 <place> … … 69 74 <city>Santa Fe</city> 70 75 <state>NM</state> 71 <postal>8750 2</postal>76 <postal>87505</postal> 72 77 <country>United States Of America</country> 73 78 </cntaddr> … … 94 99 <procstep> 95 100 <procdesc>Dataset developed per the instructions found in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Recommendations for Nationally Consistent Data and Measures within the Environmental Public Health Tracking Network, version 1.3, (http://ephtracking.cdc.gov/docs/CDC_NCDM_Pt1_1.3.pdf). </procdesc> 96 <procdate>201 10518</procdate>101 <procdate>20160203</procdate> 97 102 </procstep> 98 103 <procstep> … … 122 127 rgis.unm.edu) or other servers hosted at UNM Earth Data Analysis Center. 123 128 </procdesc> 124 <procdate>201 20417</procdate>129 <procdate>20170920</procdate> 125 130 </procstep></lineage> 126 131 </dataqual> … … 149 154 <city>Santa Fe</city> 150 155 <state>NM</state> 151 <postal>8750 2</postal>156 <postal>87505</postal> 152 157 <country>United States Of America</country> 153 158 </cntaddr> … … 168 173 </distinfo> 169 174 <metainfo> 170 <metd>20 110518</metd>175 <metd>20210914</metd> 171 176 <metc> 172 177 <cntinfo> … … 181 186 <city>Santa Fe</city> 182 187 <state>NM</state> 183 <postal>8750 2</postal>188 <postal>87505</postal> 184 189 <country>United States Of America</country> 185 190 </cntaddr> … … 193 198 </cntinfo> 194 199 </metc> 195 <metstdn>EPHTN Tracking Network Profile Version 1.2</metstdn>200 <metstdn>EPHTN Tracking Network Profile Version 3.0</metstdn> 196 201 <metac>None</metac> 197 202 <metuc>None</metuc> -
adopters/nm-epht/trunk/src/main/webapps/nmepht-content/xml/metadata/PrevalenceDownSyn35older.xml
r11544 r25090 5 5 <citeinfo> 6 6 <origin>New Mexico EPHTN Project Manager</origin> 7 <pubdate>20 110609</pubdate>7 <pubdate>20210914</pubdate> 8 8 <title>Prevalence of Trisomy 21 (Down Syndrome) per 10,000 Live Births to Mothers 35 Years of age and Older at Delivery</title> 9 9 <onlink/> … … 11 11 </citation> 12 12 <descript> 13 <abstract>This data set supports calculation of the frequency ("prevalence") of infants born with birth defect, which is Down syndrome per number of live births among New Mexico resident mothers 35 years of age and older at delivery. Prevalence of Down syndrome among mothers 35 years of age and older at delivery is the number of live-born infants with Down syndrome among mothers 35 years of age and older at delivery per 10,000 live-born infants to mothers 35 years of age and older at delivery. The prevalence of Down syndrome per 10,000 live births measure is presented by county, for 20 04-2007.</abstract>13 <abstract>This data set supports calculation of the frequency ("prevalence") of infants born with birth defect, which is Down syndrome per number of live births among New Mexico resident mothers 35 years of age and older at delivery. Prevalence of Down syndrome among mothers 35 years of age and older at delivery is the number of live-born infants with Down syndrome among mothers 35 years of age and older at delivery per 10,000 live-born infants to mothers 35 years of age and older at delivery. The prevalence of Down syndrome per 10,000 live births measure is presented by county, for 2015-2019.</abstract> 14 14 <purpose>Dataset was created to provide data for the New Mexico Environmental Public Health Tracking Network in order to monitor spatial and temporal variation in the annual prevalence of Down syndrome, one of the major birth defects consistent with Nationally Consistent Data and Measures (NCDMs).</purpose> 15 <supplinf>The data are from the New Mexico Birth Defects and Surveillance System (NM BDPASS). In January 2000 birth defects became a reportable condition; however, birth defects were collected prior to this date. The first year of consistent data is 1998. However, data for Down syndrome were not collected consistently until 2004. The most recent year of analyzed data is 2007. Data are collected on births occurring in-state to NM residents. We do not currently receive births for NM residents which occur out of state. NM BDPASS collects birth defect data among live births as well as fetal losses, which include stillbirths, spontaneous abortions and elective terminations occurring at all gestational ages. Birth defect cases are ascertained up to age 4; however, the majority of diagnoses are made by age 1. Surveillance methods include a combination of active and passive case ascertainment. Case finding/identification occurs through review of birth and death certificates, hospital discharge diagnoses, records from pediatric specialists and prenatal diagnostic providers. The birth defects coding system is ICD-9-CM, supplemented with the CDC-BPA coding system for specific diagnoses. The following ICD-9-CM codes were used to identify Down syndrome: 758.0. 16 In 1987, CDC put forth a set of 6 digit codes (the sixth digit provides greater specificity for diagnosis) based on the British Pediatric Association Classification of Diseases and the ICD-9-CM. If CDC/BPA codes are present, the following were used to identify Down syndrome: 758.000 - 740.090.</supplinf> 15 <supplinf>The data are from the New Mexico Birth Defects and Surveillance System (NM BDPASS). In January 2000 birth defects became a reportable condition; however, birth defects were collected prior to this date. The first year of consistent data is 1998. However, data for Down syndrome were not collected consistently until 2004. The most recent year of analyzed data is 2019. Data are collected on births occurring in-state to NM residents. We do not currently receive births for NM residents which occur out of state. NM BDPASS collects birth defect data among live births as well as fetal losses, which include stillbirths, spontaneous abortions and elective terminations occurring at all gestational ages. Birth defect cases are ascertained up to age 4; however, the majority of diagnoses are made by age 1. Surveillance methods include a combination of active and passive case ascertainment. Case finding/identification occurs through review of birth and death certificates, hospital discharge diagnoses, records from pediatric specialists and prenatal diagnostic providers. 16 The following International Classification of Diseases, 9th and 10th Revisions Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM) codes were used in 2015 to identify Trisomy 21 (Down syndrome - combined births to mothers 35 years of age and older and under age 35): 758.0 and Q90.0-Q90.9, respectively. Only ICD-10-CM code was used from 2016-2019. 17 In 1987, CDC put forth a set of 6-digit codes (the sixth digit provides greater specificity for diagnosis) based on the British Pediatric Association Classification of Diseases and the ICD-9-CM. If CDC/BPA codes are present, the following were used to identify Down syndrome: 758.00 - 758.09.</supplinf> 17 18 </descript> 18 19 <timeperd> 19 20 <timeinfo> 20 21 <rngdates> 21 <begdate>20 040101</begdate>22 <begdate>20150101</begdate> 22 23 <begtime/> 23 <enddate>20 071231</enddate>24 <enddate>20191231</enddate> 24 25 <endtime/> 25 26 </rngdates> … … 54 55 <themekt>ICD-9-CM</themekt> 55 56 <themekey>758.0</themekey> 57 <themekey/> 58 </theme> 59 <theme> 60 <themekt>ICD-10-CM</themekt> 61 <themekey>Q90.0-Q90.9</themekey> 56 62 <themekey/> 57 63 </theme> … … 75 81 <city>Santa Fe</city> 76 82 <state>NM</state> 77 <postal>8750 2</postal>83 <postal>87505</postal> 78 84 <country>United States Of America</country> 79 85 </cntaddr> … … 100 106 <procstep> 101 107 <procdesc>Dataset developed per the instructions found in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Recommendations for Nationally Consistent Data and Measures within the Environmental Public Health Tracking Network, version 1.3, (http://ephtracking.cdc.gov/docs/CDC_NCDM_Pt1_1.3.pdf). </procdesc> 102 <procdate>201 10609</procdate>108 <procdate>20160203</procdate> 103 109 </procstep> 104 110 <procstep> … … 128 134 rgis.unm.edu) or other servers hosted at UNM Earth Data Analysis Center. 129 135 </procdesc> 130 <procdate>201 20417</procdate>136 <procdate>20170920</procdate> 131 137 </procstep></lineage> 132 138 </dataqual> … … 154 160 <city>Santa Fe</city> 155 161 <state>NM</state> 156 <postal>8750 2</postal>162 <postal>87505</postal> 157 163 <country>United States Of America</country> 158 164 </cntaddr> … … 173 179 </distinfo> 174 180 <metainfo> 175 <metd>20 110609</metd>181 <metd>20210914</metd> 176 182 <metc> 177 183 <cntinfo> … … 186 192 <city>Santa Fe</city> 187 193 <state>NM</state> 188 <postal>8750 2</postal>194 <postal>87505</postal> 189 195 <country>United States Of America</country> 190 196 </cntaddr> … … 198 204 </cntinfo> 199 205 </metc> 200 <metstdn>EPHTN Tracking Network Profile Version 1.2</metstdn>206 <metstdn>EPHTN Tracking Network Profile Version 3.0</metstdn> 201 207 <metac>None</metac> 202 208 <metuc>None</metuc> -
adopters/nm-epht/trunk/src/main/webapps/nmepht-content/xml/metadata/PrevalenceDownSynLess35.xml
r11544 r25090 5 5 <citeinfo> 6 6 <origin>New Mexico EPHTN Project Manager</origin> 7 <pubdate>20 110609</pubdate>7 <pubdate>20210914</pubdate> 8 8 <title>Prevalence of Trisomy 21 (Down Syndrome) per 10,000 Live Births to Mothers Less Than 35 Years of age at Delivery</title> 9 9 <onlink/> … … 11 11 </citation> 12 12 <descript> 13 <abstract>This data set supports calculation of the frequency ("prevalence") of infants born with birth defect, which is Down syndrome per number of live births among New Mexico resident mothers less than 35 years of age at delivery. Prevalence of Down syndrome among mothers less than 35 years of age at delivery is the number of live-born infants with Down syndrome among mothers less tha 35 years of age at delivery per 10,000 live-born infants to mothers less than 35 years of age at delivery. The prevalence of Down syndrome per 10,000 live births measure is presented by county, for 20 04-2007.</abstract>13 <abstract>This data set supports calculation of the frequency ("prevalence") of infants born with birth defect, which is Down syndrome per number of live births among New Mexico resident mothers less than 35 years of age at delivery. Prevalence of Down syndrome among mothers less than 35 years of age at delivery is the number of live-born infants with Down syndrome among mothers less tha 35 years of age at delivery per 10,000 live-born infants to mothers less than 35 years of age at delivery. The prevalence of Down syndrome per 10,000 live births measure is presented by county, for 2015-2019.</abstract> 14 14 <purpose>Dataset was created to provide data for the New Mexico Environmental Public Health Tracking Network in order to monitor spatial and temporal variation in the annual prevalence of Down syndrome, one of the major birth defects consistent with Nationally Consistent Data and Measures (NCDMs).</purpose> 15 <supplinf>The data are from the New Mexico Birth Defects and Surveillance System (NM BDPASS). In January 2000 birth defects became a reportable condition; however, birth defects were collected prior to this date. The first year of consistent data is 1998. However, data for Down syndrome were not collected consistently until 2004. The most recent year of analyzed data is 2007. Data are collected on births occurring in-state to NM residents. We do not currently receive births for NM residents which occur out of state. NM BDPASS collects birth defect data among live births as well as fetal losses, which include stillbirths, spontaneous abortions and elective terminations occurring at all gestational ages. Birth defect cases are ascertained up to age 4; however, the majority of diagnoses are made by age 1. Surveillance methods include a combination of active and passive case ascertainment. Case finding/identification occurs through review of birth and death certificates, hospital discharge diagnoses, records from pediatric specialists and prenatal diagnostic providers. The birth defects coding system is ICD-9-CM, supplemented with the CDC-BPA coding system for specific diagnoses. The following ICD-9-CM codes were used to identify Down syndrome: 758.0. 16 In 1987, CDC put forth a set of 6 digit codes (the sixth digit provides greater specificity for diagnosis) based on the British Pediatric Association Classification of Diseases and the ICD-9-CM. If CDC/BPA codes are present, the following were used to identify Down syndrome: 758.000 - 740.090.</supplinf> 15 <supplinf>The data are from the New Mexico Birth Defects and Surveillance System (NM BDPASS). In January 2000 birth defects became a reportable condition; however, birth defects were collected prior to this date. The first year of consistent data is 1998. However, data for Down syndrome were not collected consistently until 2004. The most recent year of analyzed data is 2019. Data are collected on births occurring in-state to NM residents. We do not currently receive births for NM residents which occur out of state. NM BDPASS collects birth defect data among live births as well as fetal losses, which include stillbirths, spontaneous abortions and elective terminations occurring at all gestational ages. Birth defect cases are ascertained up to age 4; however, the majority of diagnoses are made by age 1. Surveillance methods include a combination of active and passive case ascertainment. Case finding/identification occurs through review of birth and death certificates, hospital discharge diagnoses, records from pediatric specialists and prenatal diagnostic providers. 16 The following International Classification of Diseases, 9th and 10th Revisions Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM) codes were used in 2015 to identify Trisomy 21 (Down syndrome - combined births to mothers under age 35 and 35 years of age and older): 758.0 and Q90.0-Q90.9, respectively. Only ICD-10-CM code was used from 2016-2019. 17 In 1987, CDC put forth a set of 6-digit codes (the sixth digit provides greater specificity for diagnosis) based on the British Pediatric Association Classification of Diseases and the ICD-9-CM. If CDC/BPA codes are present, the following were used to identify Down syndrome: 758.00 - 740.09.</supplinf> 17 18 </descript> 18 19 <timeperd> 19 20 <timeinfo> 20 21 <rngdates> 21 <begdate>20 040101</begdate>22 <begdate>20150101</begdate> 22 23 <begtime/> 23 <enddate>20 071231</enddate>24 <enddate>20191231</enddate> 24 25 <endtime/> 25 26 </rngdates> … … 52 53 <themekt>ICD-9-CM</themekt> 53 54 <themekey>758.0</themekey> 55 </theme> 56 <theme> 57 <themekt>ICD-10-CM</themekt> 58 <themekey>Q90.0-Q90.9</themekey> 54 59 </theme> 55 60 <place> … … 72 77 <city>Santa Fe</city> 73 78 <state>NM</state> 74 <postal>8750 2</postal>79 <postal>87505</postal> 75 80 <country>United States Of America</country> 76 81 </cntaddr> … … 97 102 <procstep> 98 103 <procdesc>Dataset developed per the instructions found in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Recommendations for Nationally Consistent Data and Measures within the Environmental Public Health Tracking Network, version 1.3, (http://ephtracking.cdc.gov/docs/CDC_NCDM_Pt1_1.3.pdf). </procdesc> 99 <procdate>201 10609</procdate>104 <procdate>20160203</procdate> 100 105 </procstep> 101 106 <procstep> … … 125 130 rgis.unm.edu) or other servers hosted at UNM Earth Data Analysis Center. 126 131 </procdesc> 127 <procdate>201 20417</procdate>132 <procdate>20170920</procdate> 128 133 </procstep></lineage> 129 134 </dataqual> … … 151 156 <city>Santa Fe</city> 152 157 <state>NM</state> 153 <postal>8750 2</postal>158 <postal>87505</postal> 154 159 <country>United States Of America</country> 155 160 </cntaddr> … … 170 175 </distinfo> 171 176 <metainfo> 172 <metd>20 110609</metd>177 <metd>20210914</metd> 173 178 <metc> 174 179 <cntinfo> … … 183 188 <city>Santa Fe</city> 184 189 <state>NM</state> 185 <postal>8750 2</postal>190 <postal>87505</postal> 186 191 <country>United States Of America</country> 187 192 </cntaddr> … … 195 200 </cntinfo> 196 201 </metc> 197 <metstdn>EPHTN Tracking Network Profile Version 1.2</metstdn>202 <metstdn>EPHTN Tracking Network Profile Version 3.0</metstdn> 198 203 <metac>None</metac> 199 204 <metuc>None</metuc> -
adopters/nm-epht/trunk/src/main/webapps/nmepht-content/xml/metadata/PrevalenceGatroschisis.xml
r11544 r25090 5 5 <citeinfo> 6 6 <origin>New Mexico EPHTN Project Manager</origin> 7 <pubdate>20 110606</pubdate>7 <pubdate>20210914</pubdate> 8 8 <title>Prevalence of Gastroschisis per 10,000 Live Births</title> 9 9 <onlink/> … … 11 11 </citation> 12 12 <descript> 13 <abstract>This data set supports calculation of the frequency ("prevalence") of infants born with birth defect, which is gastroschisis per number of live births among New Mexico residents. Prevalence of gastroschisis is the number of live-born infants with gastroschisis per 10,000 live-born infants. The prevalence of gastroschisis per 10,000 live births measure is presented by county, for 1998-2007.</abstract>13 <abstract>This data set supports calculation of the frequency ("prevalence") of infants born with birth defect, which is gastroschisis per number of live births among New Mexico residents. Prevalence of gastroschisis is the number of live-born infants with gastroschisis per 10,000 live-born infants. The prevalence of gastroschisis per 10,000 live births measure is presented by county, for 2015-2019.</abstract> 14 14 <purpose>Dataset was created to provide data for the New Mexico Environmental Public Health Tracking Network in order to monitor spatial and temporal variation in the annual prevalence of gastroschisis, one of the major birth defects consistent with Nationally Consistent Data and Measures (NCDMs).</purpose> 15 <supplinf>The data are from the New Mexico Birth Defects and Surveillance System (NM BDPASS). In January 2000 birth defects became a reportable condition; however, birth defects were collected prior to this date. The first year of consistent data is 1998. For gastroschisis, the most recent year of analyzed data is 2007. Data are collected on births occurring in-state to NM residents. We do not currently receive births for NM residents which occur out of state. NM BDPASS collects birth defect data among live births as well as fetal losses, which include stillbirths, spontaneous abortions and elective terminations occurring at all gestational ages. Birth defect cases are ascertained up to age 4; however, the majority of diagnoses are made by age 1. Surveillance methods include a combination of active and passive case ascertainment. Case finding/identification occurs through review of birth and death certificates, hospital discharge diagnoses, records from pediatric specialists and prenatal diagnostic providers. The birth defects coding system is ICD-9-CM, supplemented with the CDC-BPA coding system for specific diagnoses. 16 In 1987, CDC put forth a set of 6 digit codes (the sixth digit provides greater specificity for diagnosis) based on the British Pediatric Association Classification of Diseases and the ICD-9-CM. If CDC/BPA codes are present, the following were used to identify gastroschisis: 756.710.</supplinf> 15 <supplinf>The data are from the New Mexico Birth Defects and Surveillance System (NM BDPASS). In January 2000 birth defects became a reportable condition; however, birth defects were collected prior to this date. The first year of consistent data is 1998. For gastroschisis, the most recent year of analyzed data is 2019. Data are collected on births occurring in-state to NM residents. We do not currently receive births for NM residents which occur out of state. NM BDPASS collects birth defect data among live births as well as fetal losses, which include stillbirths, spontaneous abortions and elective terminations occurring at all gestational ages. Birth defect cases are ascertained up to age 4; however, the majority of diagnoses are made by age 1. Surveillance methods include a combination of active and passive case ascertainment. Case finding/identification occurs through review of birth and death certificates, hospital discharge diagnoses, records from pediatric specialists and prenatal diagnostic providers. 16 The following International Classification of Diseases, 9th and 10th Revisions Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM) codes were used in 2015 to identify gastroschisis: 756.73 and Q79.3, respectively. Only ICD-10-CM code was used from 2016-2019. 17 In 1987, CDC put forth a set of 6-digit codes (the sixth digit provides greater specificity for diagnosis) based on the British Pediatric Association Classification of Diseases and the ICD-9-CM. If CDC/BPA codes are present, the following were used to identify gastroschisis: 756.71.</supplinf> 17 18 </descript> 18 19 <timeperd> 19 20 <timeinfo> 20 21 <rngdates> 21 <begdate> 19980101</begdate>22 <begdate>20150101</begdate> 22 23 <begtime/> 23 <enddate>20 071231</enddate>24 <enddate>20191231</enddate> 24 25 <endtime/> 25 26 </rngdates> … … 41 42 <keywords> 42 43 <theme> 43 <themekt>PH_ProcedureClassification_ICD-9CM</themekt> 44 <themekey>756.710</themekey> 44 <themekt>ICD-9-CM</themekt> 45 <themekey>756.73 (Prior to 10/01/2009, 756.79 was the shared ICD-9-CM code for omphalocele and gastroschisis. Beginning on 10/01/2009, ICD-9-CM code used for gastroschisis was 756.73).</themekey> 46 </theme> 47 <theme> 48 <themekt>ICD-10-CM</themekt> 49 <themekey>Q79.3</themekey> 45 50 </theme> 46 51 <theme> … … 67 72 <city>Santa Fe</city> 68 73 <state>NM</state> 69 <postal>8750 2</postal>74 <postal>87505</postal> 70 75 <country>United States Of America</country> 71 76 </cntaddr> … … 92 97 <procstep> 93 98 <procdesc>Dataset developed per the instructions found in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Recommendations for Nationally Consistent Data and Measures within the Environmental Public Health Tracking Network, version 1.3, (http://ephtracking.cdc.gov/docs/CDC_NCDM_Pt1_1.3.pdf). </procdesc> 94 <procdate>201 10606</procdate>99 <procdate>20160203</procdate> 95 100 </procstep> 96 101 <procstep> … … 120 125 rgis.unm.edu) or other servers hosted at UNM Earth Data Analysis Center. 121 126 </procdesc> 122 <procdate>201 20417</procdate>127 <procdate>20170920</procdate> 123 128 </procstep></lineage> 124 129 </dataqual> … … 147 152 <city>Santa Fe</city> 148 153 <state>NM</state> 149 <postal>8750 2</postal>154 <postal>87505</postal> 150 155 <country>United States Of America</country> 151 156 </cntaddr> … … 166 171 </distinfo> 167 172 <metainfo> 168 <metd>20 110606</metd>173 <metd>20210914</metd> 169 174 <metc> 170 175 <cntinfo> … … 179 184 <city>Santa Fe</city> 180 185 <state>NM</state> 181 <postal>8750 2</postal>186 <postal>87505</postal> 182 187 <country>United States Of America</country> 183 188 </cntaddr> … … 191 196 </cntinfo> 192 197 </metc> 193 <metstdn>EPHTN Tracking Network Profile Version 1.2</metstdn>198 <metstdn>EPHTN Tracking Network Profile Version 3.0</metstdn> 194 199 <metac>None</metac> 195 200 <metuc>None</metuc> -
adopters/nm-epht/trunk/src/main/webapps/nmepht-content/xml/metadata/PrevalenceHypoplasticLeftHeart.xml
r11544 r25090 5 5 <citeinfo> 6 6 <origin>New Mexico EPHTN Project Manager</origin> 7 <pubdate>20 110606</pubdate>7 <pubdate>20210914</pubdate> 8 8 <title>Prevalence of Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome per 10,000 Live Births</title> 9 9 <onlink/> … … 11 11 </citation> 12 12 <descript> 13 <abstract>This data set supports calculation of the frequency ("prevalence") of infants born with birth defect, which is hypoplastic left heart syndrome per number of live births among New Mexico residents. Prevalence of hypoplastic left heart syndrome is the number of live-born infants with hypoplastic left heart syndrome per 10,000 live-born infants. The prevalence of hypoplastic left heart syndrome per 10,000 live births measure is presented by county, for 20 04-2007.</abstract>13 <abstract>This data set supports calculation of the frequency ("prevalence") of infants born with birth defect, which is hypoplastic left heart syndrome per number of live births among New Mexico residents. Prevalence of hypoplastic left heart syndrome is the number of live-born infants with hypoplastic left heart syndrome per 10,000 live-born infants. The prevalence of hypoplastic left heart syndrome per 10,000 live births measure is presented by county, for 2015-2019.</abstract> 14 14 <purpose>Dataset was created to provide data for the New Mexico Environmental Public Health Tracking Network in order to monitor spatial and temporal variation in the annual prevalence of hypoplastic left heart syndrome, one of the major birth defects consistent with Nationally Consistent Data and Measures (NCDMs).</purpose> 15 <supplinf>The data are from the New Mexico Birth Defects and Surveillance System (NM BDPASS). In January 2000 birth defects became a reportable condition; however, birth defects were collected prior to this date. The first year of consistent data is 1998. However, data for hypoplastic left heart syndrome were not collected consistently until 2004. The most recent year of analyzed data is 2007. Data are collected on births occurring in-state to NM residents. We do not currently receive births for NM residents which occur out of state. NM BDPASS collects birth defect data among live births as well as fetal losses, which include stillbirths, spontaneous abortions and elective terminations occurring at all gestational ages. Birth defect cases are ascertained up to age 4; however, the majority of diagnoses are made by age 1. Surveillance methods include a combination of active and passive case ascertainment. Case finding/identification occurs through review of birth and death certificates, hospital discharge diagnoses, records from pediatric specialists and prenatal diagnostic providers. The birth defects coding system is ICD-9-CM, supplemented with the CDC-BPA coding system for specific diagnoses. The following ICD-9-CM codes were used to identify hypoplastic left heart syndrome: 746.7. 16 In 1987, CDC put forth a set of 6 digit codes (the sixth digit provides greater specificity for diagnosis) based on the British Pediatric Association Classification of Diseases and the ICD-9-CM. If CDC/BPA codes are present, the following were used to identify hypoplastic left heart syndrome: 746.700.</supplinf> 15 <supplinf>The data are from the New Mexico Birth Defects and Surveillance System (NM BDPASS). In January 2000 birth defects became a reportable condition; however, birth defects were collected prior to this date. The first year of consistent data is 1998. However, data for hypoplastic left heart syndrome were not collected consistently until 2004. The most recent year of analyzed data is 2019. Data are collected on births occurring in-state to NM residents. We do not currently receive births for NM residents which occur out of state. NM BDPASS collects birth defect data among live births as well as fetal losses, which include stillbirths, spontaneous abortions and elective terminations occurring at all gestational ages. Birth defect cases are ascertained up to age 4; however, the majority of diagnoses are made by age 1. Surveillance methods include a combination of active and passive case ascertainment. Case finding/identification occurs through review of birth and death certificates, hospital discharge diagnoses, records from pediatric specialists and prenatal diagnostic providers. 16 The following International Classification of Diseases, 9th and 10th Revisions Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM) codes were used in 2015 to identify HLHS: 746.7 and Q23.4, respectively. Only ICD-10-CM code was used from 2016-2019. 17 In 1987, CDC put forth a set of 6-digit codes (the sixth digit provides greater specificity for diagnosis) based on the British Pediatric Association Classification of Diseases and the ICD-9-CM. If CDC/BPA codes are present, the following were used to identify HLHS: 746.70.</supplinf> 17 18 </descript> 18 19 <timeperd> 19 20 <timeinfo> 20 21 <rngdates> 21 <begdate>20 040101</begdate>22 <begdate>20150101</begdate> 22 23 <begtime/> 23 <enddate>20 071231</enddate>24 <enddate>20191231</enddate> 24 25 <endtime/> 25 26 </rngdates> … … 41 42 <keywords> 42 43 <theme> 43 <themekt>PH_ProcedureClassification_ICD-9CM</themekt> 44 <themekey>746.700</themekey> 44 <themekt>ICD-9-CM</themekt> 45 <themekey>746.70</themekey> 46 <themekey/> 47 </theme> 48 <theme> 49 <themekt>ICD-10-CM</themekt> 50 <themekey>Q23.4</themekey> 45 51 <themekey/> 46 52 </theme> … … 48 54 <themekt>PH_PublicHealthCaseRecordType_CDC</themekt> 49 55 <themekey>birth defect, hypoplastic left heart syndrome</themekey> 50 </theme>51 <theme>52 <themekt>ICD-9-CM</themekt>53 <themekey>746.7</themekey>54 56 </theme> 55 57 <place> … … 72 74 <city>Santa Fe</city> 73 75 <state>NM</state> 74 <postal>8750 2</postal>76 <postal>87505</postal> 75 77 <country>United States Of America</country> 76 78 </cntaddr> … … 97 99 <procstep> 98 100 <procdesc>Dataset developed per the instructions found in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Recommendations for Nationally Consistent Data and Measures within the Environmental Public Health Tracking Network, version 1.3, (http://ephtracking.cdc.gov/docs/CDC_NCDM_Pt1_1.3.pdf). </procdesc> 99 <procdate>201 10606</procdate>101 <procdate>20160203</procdate> 100 102 </procstep> 101 103 <procstep> … … 125 127 rgis.unm.edu) or other servers hosted at UNM Earth Data Analysis Center. 126 128 </procdesc> 127 <procdate>201 20417</procdate>129 <procdate>20170920</procdate> 128 130 </procstep></lineage> 129 131 </dataqual> … … 152 154 <city>Santa Fe</city> 153 155 <state>NM</state> 154 <postal>8750 2</postal>156 <postal>87505</postal> 155 157 <country>United States Of America</country> 156 158 </cntaddr> … … 171 173 </distinfo> 172 174 <metainfo> 173 <metd>20 110606</metd>175 <metd>20210914</metd> 174 176 <metc> 175 177 <cntinfo> … … 184 186 <city>Santa Fe</city> 185 187 <state>NM</state> 186 <postal>8750 2</postal>188 <postal>87505</postal> 187 189 <country>United States Of America</country> 188 190 </cntaddr> … … 196 198 </cntinfo> 197 199 </metc> 198 <metstdn>EPHTN Tracking Network Profile Version 1.2</metstdn>200 <metstdn>EPHTN Tracking Network Profile Version 3.0</metstdn> 199 201 <metac>None</metac> 200 202 <metuc>None</metuc> -
adopters/nm-epht/trunk/src/main/webapps/nmepht-content/xml/metadata/PrevalenceHypospadias.xml
r11544 r25090 5 5 <citeinfo> 6 6 <origin>New Mexico EPHTN Project Manager</origin> 7 <pubdate>20 110607</pubdate>7 <pubdate>20210914</pubdate> 8 8 <title>Prevalence of Hypospadias per 10,000 Live Births</title> 9 9 <onlink/> … … 11 11 </citation> 12 12 <descript> 13 <abstract>This data set supports calculation of the frequency ("prevalence") of infants born with birth defect, which is hypospadias per number of live births among New Mexico residents. Prevalence of hypospadias is the number of live-born infants with hypospadias per 10,000 live-born infants. The prevalence of hypospadias per 10,000 live births measure is presented by county, for 20 04-2007.</abstract>13 <abstract>This data set supports calculation of the frequency ("prevalence") of infants born with birth defect, which is hypospadias per number of live births among New Mexico residents. Prevalence of hypospadias is the number of live-born infants with hypospadias per 10,000 live-born infants. The prevalence of hypospadias per 10,000 live births measure is presented by county, for 2015-2019.</abstract> 14 14 <purpose>Dataset was created to provide data for the New Mexico Environmental Public Health Tracking Network in order to monitor spatial and temporal variation in the annual prevalence of hypospadias, one of the major birth defects consistent with Nationally Consistent Data and Measures (NCDMs).</purpose> 15 <supplinf>The data are from the New Mexico Birth Defects and Surveillance System (NM BDPASS). In January 2000 birth defects became a reportable condition; however, birth defects were collected prior to this date. The first year of consistent data is 1998. However, data for hypospadias were not collected consistently until 2004. The most recent year of analyzed data is 2007. Data are collected on births occurring in-state to NM residents. We do not currently receive births for NM residents which occur out of state. NM BDPASS collects birth defect data among live births as well as fetal losses, which include stillbirths, spontaneous abortions and elective terminations occurring at all gestational ages. Birth defect cases are ascertained up to age 4; however, the majority of diagnoses are made by age 1. Surveillance methods include a combination of active and passive case ascertainment. Case finding/identification occurs through review of birth and death certificates, hospital discharge diagnoses, records from pediatric specialists and prenatal diagnostic providers. The birth defects coding system is ICD-9-CM, supplemented with the CDC-BPA coding system for specific diagnoses. The following ICD-9-CM codes were used to identify hypospadias: 752.61. 16 In 1987, CDC put forth a set of 6 digit codes (the sixth digit provides greater specificity for diagnosis) based on the British Pediatric Association Classification of Diseases and the ICD-9-CM. If CDC/BPA codes are present, the following were used to identify hypospadias: 752.600, 752.605, 752.606, 752.607, 752.625, 752.626, 752.627.</supplinf> 15 <supplinf>The data are from the New Mexico Birth Defects and Surveillance System (NM BDPASS). In January 2000 birth defects became a reportable condition; however, birth defects were collected prior to this date. The first year of consistent data is 1998. However, data for hypospadias were not collected consistently until 2004. The most recent year of analyzed data is 2019. Data are collected on births occurring in-state to NM residents. We do not currently receive births for NM residents which occur out of state. NM BDPASS collects birth defect data among live births as well as fetal losses, which include stillbirths, spontaneous abortions and elective terminations occurring at all gestational ages. Birth defect cases are ascertained up to age 4; however, the majority of diagnoses are made by age 1. Surveillance methods include a combination of active and passive case ascertainment. Case finding/identification occurs through review of birth and death certificates, hospital discharge diagnoses, records from pediatric specialists and prenatal diagnostic providers. 16 The following International Classification of Diseases, 9th and 10th Revisions Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM) codes were used in 2015 to identify hypospadias: 752.61 and Q54.0-Q54.9 (excluding Q54.4), respectively. Only ICD-10-CM code was used from 2016-2019. 17 In 1987, CDC put forth a set of 6-digit codes (the sixth digit provides greater specificity for diagnosis) based on the British Pediatric Association Classification of Diseases and the ICD-9-CM. If CDC/BPA codes are present, the following were used to identify hypospadias: 752.60-752.62 (excluding 752.61 and 752.621).</supplinf> 17 18 </descript> 18 19 <timeperd> 19 20 <timeinfo> 20 21 <rngdates> 21 <begdate>20 040101</begdate>22 <begdate>20150101</begdate> 22 23 <begtime/> 23 <enddate>20 071231</enddate>24 <enddate>20191231</enddate> 24 25 <endtime/> 25 26 </rngdates> … … 52 53 <themekt>ICD-9-CM</themekt> 53 54 <themekey>752.61</themekey> 55 </theme> 56 <theme> 57 <themekt>ICD-10-CM</themekt> 58 <themekey>Q54.0-Q54.9 (excluding Q54.4)</themekey> 54 59 </theme> 55 60 <place> … … 72 77 <city>Santa Fe</city> 73 78 <state>NM</state> 74 <postal>8750 2</postal>79 <postal>87505</postal> 75 80 <country>United States Of America</country> 76 81 </cntaddr> … … 97 102 <procstep> 98 103 <procdesc>Dataset developed per the instructions found in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Recommendations for Nationally Consistent Data and Measures within the Environmental Public Health Tracking Network, version 1.3, (http://ephtracking.cdc.gov/docs/CDC_NCDM_Pt1_1.3.pdf). </procdesc> 99 <procdate>201 10607</procdate>104 <procdate>20160203</procdate> 100 105 </procstep> 101 106 <procstep> … … 125 130 rgis.unm.edu) or other servers hosted at UNM Earth Data Analysis Center. 126 131 </procdesc> 127 <procdate>201 20417</procdate>132 <procdate>20170920</procdate> 128 133 </procstep></lineage> 129 134 </dataqual> … … 152 157 <city>Santa Fe</city> 153 158 <state>NM</state> 154 <postal>8750 2</postal>159 <postal>87505</postal> 155 160 <country>United States Of America</country> 156 161 </cntaddr> … … 171 176 </distinfo> 172 177 <metainfo> 173 <metd>20 110607</metd>178 <metd>20210914</metd> 174 179 <metc> 175 180 <cntinfo> … … 184 189 <city>Santa Fe</city> 185 190 <state>NM</state> 186 <postal>8750 2</postal>191 <postal>87505</postal> 187 192 <country>United States Of America</country> 188 193 </cntaddr> … … 196 201 </cntinfo> 197 202 </metc> 198 <metstdn>EPHTN Tracking Network Profile Version 1.2</metstdn>203 <metstdn>EPHTN Tracking Network Profile Version 3.0</metstdn> 199 204 <metac>None</metac> 200 205 <metuc>None</metuc> -
adopters/nm-epht/trunk/src/main/webapps/nmepht-content/xml/metadata/PrevalenceLowerLimbDef.xml
r24626 r25090 5 5 <citeinfo> 6 6 <origin>New Mexico EPHTN Project Manager</origin> 7 <pubdate>20 110607</pubdate>7 <pubdate>20210914</pubdate> 8 8 <title>Prevalence of Lower Limb Deficiencies per 10,000 Live Births</title> 9 9 <onlink/> … … 11 11 </citation> 12 12 <descript> 13 <abstract>This data set supports calculation of the frequency ("prevalence") of infants born with birth defect, which is lower limb deficiencies per number of live births among New Mexico residents. Prevalence of lower limb deficiencies is the number of live-born infants with lower limb deficiencies per 10,000 live-born infants. The prevalence of lower limb deficiencies per 10,000 live births measure is presented by county, for 20 04-2007.</abstract>13 <abstract>This data set supports calculation of the frequency ("prevalence") of infants born with birth defect, which is lower limb deficiencies per number of live births among New Mexico residents. Prevalence of lower limb deficiencies is the number of live-born infants with lower limb deficiencies per 10,000 live-born infants. The prevalence of lower limb deficiencies per 10,000 live births measure is presented by county, for 2015-2019.</abstract> 14 14 <purpose>Dataset was created to provide data for the New Mexico Environmental Public Health Tracking Network in order to monitor spatial and temporal variation in the annual prevalence of lower limb deficiencies, one of the major birth defects consistent with Nationally Consistent Data and Measures (NCDMs).</purpose> 15 <supplinf>The data are from the New Mexico Birth Defects and Surveillance System (NM BDPASS). In January 2000 birth defects became a reportable condition; however, birth defects were collected prior to this date. The first year of consistent data is 1998. However, data for lower limb deficiencies were not collected consistently until 2004. The most recent year of analyzed data is 2007. Data are collected on births occurring in-state to NM residents. We do not currently receive births for NM residents which occur out of state. NM BDPASS collects birth defect data among live births as well as fetal losses, which include stillbirths, spontaneous abortions and elective terminations occurring at all gestational ages. Birth defect cases are ascertained up to age 4; however, the majority of diagnoses are made by age 1. Surveillance methods include a combination of active and passive case ascertainment. Case finding/identification occurs through review of birth and death certificates, hospital discharge diagnoses, records from pediatric specialists and prenatal diagnostic providers. The birth defects coding system is ICD-9-CM, supplemented with the CDC-BPA coding system for specific diagnoses. The following ICD-9-CM codes were used to identify lower limb deficiencies: 755.30-755.39. 16 In 1987, CDC put forth a set of 6 digit codes (the sixth digit provides greater specificity for diagnosis) based on the British Pediatric Association Classification of Diseases and the ICD-9-CM. If CDC/BPA codes are present, the following were used to identify lower limb deficiencies: 755.300-755.390.</supplinf> 15 <supplinf>The data are from the New Mexico Birth Defects and Surveillance System (NM BDPASS). In January 2000 birth defects became a reportable condition; however, birth defects were collected prior to this date. The first year of consistent data is 1998. However, data for lower limb deficiencies were not collected consistently until 2004. The most recent year of analyzed data is 2019. Data are collected on births occurring in-state to NM residents. We do not currently receive births for NM residents which occur out of state. NM BDPASS collects birth defect data among live births as well as fetal losses, which include stillbirths, spontaneous abortions and elective terminations occurring at all gestational ages. Birth defect cases are ascertained up to age 4; however, the majority of diagnoses are made by age 1. Surveillance methods include a combination of active and passive case ascertainment. Case finding/identification occurs through review of birth and death certificates, hospital discharge diagnoses, records from pediatric specialists and prenatal diagnostic providers. 16 The following International Classification of Diseases, 9th and 10th Revisions Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM) codes were used in 2015 to identify lower limb deficiencies (lower and upper limb combined): 755.2-755.4 and Q71.0-Q71.9, Q72.0-Q72.9, Q73.0-Q73.8, respectively. Only ICD-10-CM code was used from 2016-2019. 17 In 1987, CDC put forth a set of 6-digit codes (the sixth digit provides greater specificity for diagnosis) based on the British Pediatric Association Classification of Diseases and the ICD-9-CM. If CDC/BPA codes are present, the following were used to identify lower limb deficiencies: 755.20-755.49.</supplinf> 17 18 </descript> 18 19 <timeperd> 19 20 <timeinfo> 20 21 <rngdates> 21 <begdate>20 040101</begdate>22 <begdate>20150101</begdate> 22 23 <begtime/> 23 <enddate>20 071231</enddate>24 <enddate>20191231</enddate> 24 25 <endtime/> 25 26 </rngdates> … … 52 53 <theme> 53 54 <themekt>ICD-9-CM</themekt> 54 <themekey>755.30-755.39</themekey> 55 <themekey>755.2-755.4</themekey> 56 </theme> 57 <theme> 58 <themekt>ICD-10-CM</themekt> 59 <themekey>Q71.0-Q71.9, Q72.0-Q72.9, Q73.0-Q73.8</themekey> 55 60 </theme> 56 61 <place> … … 73 78 <city>Santa Fe</city> 74 79 <state>NM</state> 75 <postal>8750 2</postal>80 <postal>87505</postal> 76 81 <country>United States Of America</country> 77 82 </cntaddr> … … 98 103 <procstep> 99 104 <procdesc>Dataset developed per the instructions found in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Recommendations for Nationally Consistent Data and Measures within the Environmental Public Health Tracking Network, version 1.3, (http://ephtracking.cdc.gov/docs/CDC_NCDM_Pt1_1.3.pdf). </procdesc> 100 <procdate>201 10607</procdate>105 <procdate>20160203</procdate> 101 106 </procstep> 102 107 <procstep> … … 126 131 rgis.unm.edu) or other servers hosted at UNM Earth Data Analysis Center. 127 132 </procdesc> 128 <procdate>201 20417</procdate>133 <procdate>20170920</procdate> 129 134 </procstep></lineage> 130 135 </dataqual> … … 153 158 <city>Santa Fe</city> 154 159 <state>NM</state> 155 <postal>8750 2</postal>160 <postal>87505</postal> 156 161 <country>United States Of America</country> 157 162 </cntaddr> … … 172 177 </distinfo> 173 178 <metainfo> 174 <metd>20 110607</metd>179 <metd>20210914</metd> 175 180 <metc> 176 181 <cntinfo> … … 185 190 <city>Santa Fe</city> 186 191 <state>NM</state> 187 <postal>8750 2</postal>192 <postal>87505</postal> 188 193 <country>United States Of America</country> 189 194 </cntaddr> … … 197 202 </cntinfo> 198 203 </metc> 199 <metstdn>EPHTN Tracking Network Profile Version 1.2</metstdn>204 <metstdn>EPHTN Tracking Network Profile Version 3.0</metstdn> 200 205 <metac>None</metac> 201 206 <metuc>None</metuc> -
adopters/nm-epht/trunk/src/main/webapps/nmepht-content/xml/metadata/PrevalenceSpinaBifida.xml
r11544 r25090 5 5 <citeinfo> 6 6 <origin>New Mexico EPHTN Project Manager</origin> 7 <pubdate>20 110518</pubdate>7 <pubdate>20210914</pubdate> 8 8 <title>Prevalence of Spina Bifida (without Anencephaly) per 10,000 Live Births </title> 9 9 <onlink/> … … 11 11 </citation> 12 12 <descript> 13 <abstract>This data set supports calculation of the frequency ("prevalence") of infants born with birth defect, which is spina bifida (without anencephaly) per number of live births among New Mexico residents. Prevalence of spina bifida (without anencephaly) is the number of live-born infants with spina bifida per 10,000 live-born infants. The prevalence of spina bifida per 10,000 live births measure is presented by county, for 1998-2007.</abstract>13 <abstract>This data set supports calculation of the frequency ("prevalence") of infants born with birth defect, which is spina bifida (without anencephaly) per number of live births among New Mexico residents. Prevalence of spina bifida (without anencephaly) is the number of live-born infants with spina bifida per 10,000 live-born infants. The prevalence of spina bifida per 10,000 live births measure is presented by county, for 2015-2019.</abstract> 14 14 <purpose>Dataset was created to provide data for the New Mexico Environmental Public Health Tracking Network in order to monitor spatial and temporal variation in the annual prevalence of spina bifida (without anencephaly), one of the major birth defects consistent with Nationally Consistent Data and Measures (NCDMs.</purpose> 15 15 <supplinf>The data are from the New Mexico Birth Defects and Surveillance System (NM BDPASS). In January 2000 birth defects became a reportable condition; however, birth defects were collected prior to this date. Our first year of consistent data is 1998. Data are collected on births occurring in-state to NM residents. We do not currently receive births for NM residents which occur out of state. NM BDPASS collects birth defect data among live births as well as fetal losses, which include stillbirths, spontaneous abortions and elective terminations occurring at all gestational ages. Birth defect cases are ascertained up to age 4; however, the majority of diagnoses are made by age 1. Surveillance methods include a combination of active and passive case ascertainment. Case finding/identification occurs through review of birth and death certificates, hospital discharge diagnoses, records from pediatric specialists and prenatal diagnostic providers. The birth defects coding system is ICD-9-CM, supplemented with the CDC-BPA coding system for specific diagnoses. 16 The following International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes were used to identify spina bifida without anencephaly: 741.0, 741.9 without 740.0 - 740.10. In 1987, CDC put forth a set of 6 digit codes (the sixth digit provides greater specificity for diagnosis) based on the British Pediatric Association Classification of Diseases and the ICD-9-CM. If CDC/BPA codes are present, the following were used to identify spina bifida without anencephaly: 741.000 - 741.990 without 740.000 - 740.100.</supplinf> 16 The following International Classification of Diseases, 9th and 10th Revisions Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM) codes were used in 2015 to identify spina bifida without anencephaly: 741.0-741.9 without 740.0-740.10 and Q05.0-Q05.9, Q07.01, Q07.03 without Q00.0-Q00.1, respectively. Only ICD-10-CM code was used from 2016-2019. 17 In 1987, CDC put forth a set of 6-digit codes (the sixth digit provides greater specificity for diagnosis) based on the British Pediatric Association Classification of Diseases and the ICD-9-CM. If CDC/BPA codes are present, the following were used to identify spina bifida without anencephaly: 741.00-741.99 without 740.0-740.10.</supplinf> 17 18 </descript> 18 19 <timeperd> 19 20 <timeinfo> 20 21 <rngdates> 21 <begdate> 19980101</begdate>22 <begdate>20150101</begdate> 22 23 <begtime/> 23 <enddate>20 071231</enddate>24 <enddate>20191231</enddate> 24 25 <endtime/> 25 26 </rngdates> … … 47 48 <theme> 48 49 <themekt>ICD-9-CM</themekt> 49 <themekey>741.0, 741.9 without 740.0 - 740.10</themekey> 50 <themekey>741.0, 741.9 without 740.0-740.10</themekey> 51 </theme> 52 <theme> 53 <themekt>ICD-10-CM</themekt> 54 <themekey>Q05.0-Q05.9, Q07.01, Q07.03 without Q00.0-Q00.1</themekey> 50 55 </theme> 51 56 <place> … … 68 73 <city>Santa Fe</city> 69 74 <state>NM</state> 70 <postal>8750 2</postal>75 <postal>87505</postal> 71 76 <country>United States Of America</country> 72 77 </cntaddr> … … 93 98 <procstep> 94 99 <procdesc>Dataset developed per the instructions found in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Recommendations for Nationally Consistent Data and Measures within the Environmental Public Health Tracking Network, version 1.3, (http://ephtracking.cdc.gov/docs/CDC_NCDM_Pt1_1.3.pdf). </procdesc> 95 <procdate>201 10518</procdate>100 <procdate>20160203</procdate> 96 101 </procstep> 97 102 <procstep> … … 121 126 rgis.unm.edu) or other servers hosted at UNM Earth Data Analysis Center. 122 127 </procdesc> 123 <procdate>201 20417</procdate>128 <procdate>20170920</procdate> 124 129 </procstep></lineage> 125 130 </dataqual> … … 148 153 <city>Santa Fe</city> 149 154 <state>NM</state> 150 <postal>8750 2</postal>155 <postal>87505</postal> 151 156 <country>United States Of America</country> 152 157 </cntaddr> … … 167 172 </distinfo> 168 173 <metainfo> 169 <metd>20 110518</metd>174 <metd>20210914</metd> 170 175 <metc> 171 176 <cntinfo> … … 180 185 <city>Santa Fe</city> 181 186 <state>NM</state> 182 <postal>8750 2</postal>187 <postal>87505</postal> 183 188 <country>United States Of America</country> 184 189 </cntaddr> … … 192 197 </cntinfo> 193 198 </metc> 194 <metstdn>EPHTN Tracking Network Profile Version 1.2</metstdn>199 <metstdn>EPHTN Tracking Network Profile Version 3.0</metstdn> 195 200 <metac>None</metac> 196 201 <metuc>None</metuc> -
adopters/nm-epht/trunk/src/main/webapps/nmepht-content/xml/metadata/PrevalenceTGA.xml
r11544 r25090 5 5 <citeinfo> 6 6 <origin>New Mexico EPHTN Project Manager</origin> 7 <pubdate>20 110606</pubdate>7 <pubdate>20210914</pubdate> 8 8 <title>Prevalence of Transposition of the Great Arteries (Vessels) per 10,000 Live Births</title> 9 9 <onlink/> … … 11 11 </citation> 12 12 <descript> 13 <abstract>This data set supports calculation of the frequency ("prevalence") of infants born with birth defect, which is transposition of the great arteries (vessels) or TGA per number of live births among New Mexico residents. Prevalence of transposition of the great arteries (TGA) is the number of live-born infants with TGA per 10,000 live-born infants. The prevalence of TGA per 10,000 live births measure is presented by county, for 20 04-2007.</abstract>13 <abstract>This data set supports calculation of the frequency ("prevalence") of infants born with birth defect, which is transposition of the great arteries (vessels) or TGA per number of live births among New Mexico residents. Prevalence of transposition of the great arteries (TGA) is the number of live-born infants with TGA per 10,000 live-born infants. The prevalence of TGA per 10,000 live births measure is presented by county, for 2015-2019.</abstract> 14 14 <purpose>Dataset was created to provide data for the New Mexico Environmental Public Health Tracking Network in order to monitor spatial and temporal variation in the annual prevalence of TGA, one of the major birth defects consistent with Nationally Consistent Data and Measures (NCDMs).</purpose> 15 <supplinf>The data are from the New Mexico Birth Defects and Surveillance System (NM BDPASS). In January 2000 birth defects became a reportable condition; however, birth defects were collected prior to this date. The first year of consistent data is 1998. However, data for TGA were not collected consistently until 2004. The most recent year of analyzed data is 2007. Data are collected on births occurring in-state to NM residents. We do not currently receive births for NM residents which occur out of state. NM BDPASS collects birth defect data among live births as well as fetal losses, which include stillbirths, spontaneous abortions and elective terminations occurring at all gestational ages. Birth defect cases are ascertained up to age 4; however, the majority of diagnoses are made by age 1. Surveillance methods include a combination of active and passive case ascertainment. Case finding/identification occurs through review of birth and death certificates, hospital discharge diagnoses, records from pediatric specialists and prenatal diagnostic providers. The birth defects coding system is ICD-9-CM, supplemented with the CDC-BPA coding system for specific diagnoses. The following ICD-9-CM codes were used to identify transposition of the great arteries (TGA): 745.10, 745.11 (includes only double-outlet right ventricle, TGA type), 745.19. 16 In 1987, CDC put forth a set of 6 digit codes (the sixth digit provides greater specificity for diagnosis) based on the British Pediatric Association Classification of Diseases and the ICD-9-CM. If CDC/BPA codes are present, the following were used to identify TGA: 745.100 - 745.190.</supplinf> 15 <supplinf>The data are from the New Mexico Birth Defects and Surveillance System (NM BDPASS). In January 2000 birth defects became a reportable condition; however, birth defects were collected prior to this date. The first year of consistent data is 1998. However, data for TGA were not collected consistently until 2004. The most recent year of analyzed data is 2019. Data are collected on births occurring in-state to NM residents. We do not currently receive births for NM residents which occur out of state. NM BDPASS collects birth defect data among live births as well as fetal losses, which include stillbirths, spontaneous abortions and elective terminations occurring at all gestational ages. Birth defect cases are ascertained up to age 4; however, the majority of diagnoses are made by age 1. Surveillance methods include a combination of active and passive case ascertainment. Case finding/identification occurs through review of birth and death certificates, hospital discharge diagnoses, records from pediatric specialists and prenatal diagnostic providers. 16 The following International Classification of Diseases, 9th and 10th Revisions Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM) codes were used in 2015 to identify TGA: 745.10, 745.12, 745.19 (note: for CCHD, 745.10 only (d-TGA only) and Q20.3, Q20.5 (note: for CCHD, Q20.3 only), respectively. Only ICD-10-CM code was used from 2016-2019. 17 In 1987, CDC put forth a set of 6-digit codes (the sixth digit provides greater specificity for diagnosis) based on the British Pediatric Association Classification of Diseases and the ICD-9-CM. If CDC/BPA codes are present, the following were used to identify TGA: 745.10-745.12, 745.18-745.19 (note: for CCHD, 745.10 (TGA complete, no VSD), 745.11 (TGA incomplete, with VSD), 745.18 (other specified TGA), 745.19 (unspecified TGA)).</supplinf> 17 18 </descript> 18 19 <timeperd> 19 20 <timeinfo> 20 21 <rngdates> 21 <begdate>20 040101</begdate>22 <begdate>20150101</begdate> 22 23 <begtime/> 23 <enddate>20 071231</enddate>24 <enddate>20191231</enddate> 24 25 <endtime/> 25 26 </rngdates> … … 51 52 <theme> 52 53 <themekt>ICD-9-CM</themekt> 53 <themekey>745.10, 745.11 (includes only double-outlet right venricle, TGA type), 745.19</themekey> 54 <themekey>745.10, 745.12, 745.19 (note: for CCHD, 745.10 only (d-TGA only))</themekey> 55 </theme> 56 <theme> 57 <themekt>ICD-10-CM</themekt> 58 <themekey>Q20.3, Q20.5 (note: for CCHD, Q20.3 only)</themekey> 54 59 </theme> 55 60 <place> … … 72 77 <city>Santa Fe</city> 73 78 <state>NM</state> 74 <postal>8750 2</postal>79 <postal>87505</postal> 75 80 <country>United States Of America</country> 76 81 </cntaddr> … … 97 102 <procstep> 98 103 <procdesc>Dataset developed per the instructions found in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Recommendations for Nationally Consistent Data and Measures within the Environmental Public Health Tracking Network, version 1.3, (http://ephtracking.cdc.gov/docs/CDC_NCDM_Pt1_1.3.pdf). </procdesc> 99 <procdate>201 10606</procdate>104 <procdate>20160203</procdate> 100 105 </procstep> 101 106 <procstep> … … 125 130 rgis.unm.edu) or other servers hosted at UNM Earth Data Analysis Center. 126 131 </procdesc> 127 <procdate>201 20417</procdate>132 <procdate>20170920</procdate> 128 133 </procstep><procstep> 129 134 <procdesc>NM EPHT data queries through nmtracking.org (NMTracking) result in … … 152 157 rgis.unm.edu) or other servers hosted at UNM Earth Data Analysis Center. 153 158 </procdesc> 154 <procdate>201 20417</procdate>159 <procdate>20170920</procdate> 155 160 </procstep></lineage> 156 161 </dataqual> … … 179 184 <city>Santa Fe</city> 180 185 <state>NM</state> 181 <postal>8750 2</postal>186 <postal>87505</postal> 182 187 <country>United States Of America</country> 183 188 </cntaddr> … … 198 203 </distinfo> 199 204 <metainfo> 200 <metd>20 110606</metd>205 <metd>20210914</metd> 201 206 <metc> 202 207 <cntinfo> … … 211 216 <city>Santa Fe</city> 212 217 <state>NM</state> 213 <postal>8750 2</postal>218 <postal>87505</postal> 214 219 <country>United States Of America</country> 215 220 </cntaddr> … … 223 228 </cntinfo> 224 229 </metc> 225 <metstdn>EPHTN Tracking Network Profile Version 1.2</metstdn>230 <metstdn>EPHTN Tracking Network Profile Version 3.0</metstdn> 226 231 <metac>None</metac> 227 232 <metuc>None</metuc> -
adopters/nm-epht/trunk/src/main/webapps/nmepht-content/xml/metadata/PrevalenceTetralogyFallot.xml
r11544 r25090 5 5 <citeinfo> 6 6 <origin>New Mexico EPHTN Project Manager</origin> 7 <pubdate>20 110607</pubdate>7 <pubdate>20210914</pubdate> 8 8 <title>Prevalence of Tetralogy of Fallot per 10,000 Live Births</title> 9 9 <onlink/> … … 11 11 </citation> 12 12 <descript> 13 <abstract>This data set supports calculation of the frequency ("prevalence") of infants born with birth defect, which is tetralogy of Fallot per number of live births among New Mexico residents. Prevalence of tetralogy of Fallot is the number of live-born infants with tetralogy of Fallot per 10,000 live-born infants. The prevalence of tetralogy of Fallot per 10,000 live births measure is presented by county, for 20 04-2007.</abstract>13 <abstract>This data set supports calculation of the frequency ("prevalence") of infants born with birth defect, which is tetralogy of Fallot per number of live births among New Mexico residents. Prevalence of tetralogy of Fallot is the number of live-born infants with tetralogy of Fallot per 10,000 live-born infants. The prevalence of tetralogy of Fallot per 10,000 live births measure is presented by county, for 2015-2019.</abstract> 14 14 <purpose>Dataset was created to provide data for the New Mexico Environmental Public Health Tracking Network in order to monitor spatial and temporal variation in the annual prevalence of tetralogy of Fallot, one of the major birth defects consistent with Nationally Consistent Data and Measures (NCDMs).</purpose> 15 <supplinf>The data are from the New Mexico Birth Defects and Surveillance System (NM BDPASS). In January 2000 birth defects became a reportable condition; however, birth defects were collected prior to this date. The first year of consistent data is 1998. However, data for tetralogy of Fallot were not collected consistently until 2004. The most recent year of analyzed data is 2007. Data are collected on births occurring in-state to NM residents. We do not currently receive births for NM residents which occur out of state. NM BDPASS collects birth defect data among live births as well as fetal losses, which include stillbirths, spontaneous abortions and elective terminations occurring at all gestational ages. Birth defect cases are ascertained up to age 4; however, the majority of diagnoses are made by age 1. Surveillance methods include a combination of active and passive case ascertainment. Case finding/identification occurs through review of birth and death certificates, hospital discharge diagnoses, records from pediatric specialists and prenatal diagnostic providers. The birth defects coding system is ICD-9-CM, supplemented with the CDC-BPA coding system for specific diagnoses. The following ICD-9-CM codes were used to identify tetralogy of Fallot: 745.11, 745.2. 16 In 1987, CDC put forth a set of 6 digit codes (the sixth digit provides greater specificity for diagnosis) based on the British Pediatric Association Classification of Diseases and the ICD-9-CM. If CDC/BPA codes are present, the following were used to identify tetralogy of Fallot: 745.200, 745.210, 745.180, 746.00 plus 745.400, 747.310.</supplinf> 15 <supplinf>The data are from the New Mexico Birth Defects and Surveillance System (NM BDPASS). In January 2000 birth defects became a reportable condition; however, birth defects were collected prior to this date. The first year of consistent data is 1998. However, data for tetralogy of Fallot were not collected consistently until 2004. The most recent year of analyzed data is 2019. Data are collected on births occurring in-state to NM residents. We do not currently receive births for NM residents which occur out of state. NM BDPASS collects birth defect data among live births as well as fetal losses, which include stillbirths, spontaneous abortions and elective terminations occurring at all gestational ages. Birth defect cases are ascertained up to age 4; however, the majority of diagnoses are made by age 1. Surveillance methods include a combination of active and passive case ascertainment. Case finding/identification occurs through review of birth and death certificates, hospital discharge diagnoses, records from pediatric specialists and prenatal diagnostic providers. 16 The following International Classification of Diseases, 9th and 10th Revisions Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM) codes were used in 2015 to identify tetralogy of Fallot: 745.2 and Q21.3, respectively. Only ICD-10-CM code was used from 2016-2019. 17 In 1987, CDC put forth a set of 6-digit codes (the sixth digit provides greater specificity for diagnosis) based on the British Pediatric Association Classification of Diseases and the ICD-9-CM. If CDC/BPA codes are present, the following were used to identify tetralogy of Fallot: 745.20-745.21, 747.31.</supplinf> 17 18 </descript> 18 19 <timeperd> 19 20 <timeinfo> 20 21 <rngdates> 21 <begdate>20 040101</begdate>22 <begdate>20150101</begdate> 22 23 <begtime/> 23 <enddate>20 071231</enddate>24 <enddate>20191231</enddate> 24 25 <endtime/> 25 26 </rngdates> … … 55 56 <theme> 56 57 <themekt>ICD-9-CM</themekt> 57 <themekey>745.11, 745.2</themekey> 58 <themekey>745.2</themekey> 59 <themekey/> 60 </theme> 61 <theme> 62 <themekt>ICD-10-CM</themekt> 63 <themekey>Q21.3</themekey> 58 64 <themekey/> 59 65 </theme> … … 77 83 <city>Santa Fe</city> 78 84 <state>NM</state> 79 <postal>8750 2</postal>85 <postal>87505</postal> 80 86 <country>United States Of America</country> 81 87 </cntaddr> … … 101 107 <lineage> 102 108 <procstep> 103 <procdesc>Dataset developed per the instructions found in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Recommendations for Nationally Consistent Data and Measures within the Environmental Public Health Tracking Network, version 1. 3, (http://ephtracking.cdc.gov/docs/CDC_NCDM_Pt1_1.3.pdf). </procdesc>104 <procdate>201 10607</procdate>109 <procdesc>Dataset developed per the instructions found in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Recommendations for Nationally Consistent Data and Measures within the Environmental Public Health Tracking Network, version 1.0, (http://ephtracking.cdc.gov/docs/CDC_NCDM_Pt1_1.3.pdf). </procdesc> 110 <procdate>20160203</procdate> 105 111 </procstep> 106 112 <procstep> … … 130 136 rgis.unm.edu) or other servers hosted at UNM Earth Data Analysis Center. 131 137 </procdesc> 132 <procdate>201 20417</procdate>138 <procdate>20170920</procdate> 133 139 </procstep></lineage> 134 140 </dataqual> … … 157 163 <city>Santa Fe</city> 158 164 <state>NM</state> 159 <postal>8750 2</postal>165 <postal>87505</postal> 160 166 <country>United States Of America</country> 161 167 </cntaddr> … … 176 182 </distinfo> 177 183 <metainfo> 178 <metd>20 110607</metd>184 <metd>20210914</metd> 179 185 <metc> 180 186 <cntinfo> … … 189 195 <city>Santa Fe</city> 190 196 <state>NM</state> 191 <postal>8750 2</postal>197 <postal>87505</postal> 192 198 <country>United States Of America</country> 193 199 </cntaddr> … … 201 207 </cntinfo> 202 208 </metc> 203 <metstdn>EPHTN Tracking Network Profile Version 1.2</metstdn>209 <metstdn>EPHTN Tracking Network Profile Version 3.0</metstdn> 204 210 <metac>None</metac> 205 211 <metuc>None</metuc> -
adopters/nm-epht/trunk/src/main/webapps/nmepht-content/xml/metadata/PrevalenceUpperLimbDef.xml
r11544 r25090 5 5 <citeinfo> 6 6 <origin>New Mexico EPHTN Project Manager</origin> 7 <pubdate>20 110607</pubdate>7 <pubdate>20210914</pubdate> 8 8 <title>Prevalence of Upper Limb Deficiencies per 10,000 Live Births</title> 9 9 <onlink/> … … 11 11 </citation> 12 12 <descript> 13 <abstract>This data set supports calculation of the frequency ("prevalence") of infants born with birth defect, which is upper limb deficiencies per number of live births among New Mexico residents. Prevalence of upper limb deficiencies is the number of live-born infants with upper limb deficiencies per 10,000 live-born infants. The prevalence of upper limb deficiencies per 10,000 live births measure is presented by county, for 20 04-2007.</abstract>13 <abstract>This data set supports calculation of the frequency ("prevalence") of infants born with birth defect, which is upper limb deficiencies per number of live births among New Mexico residents. Prevalence of upper limb deficiencies is the number of live-born infants with upper limb deficiencies per 10,000 live-born infants. The prevalence of upper limb deficiencies per 10,000 live births measure is presented by county, for 2015-2019.</abstract> 14 14 <purpose>Dataset was created to provide data for the New Mexico Environmental Public Health Tracking Network in order to monitor spatial and temporal variation in the annual prevalence of upper limb deficiencies, one of the major birth defects consistent with Nationally Consistent Data and Measures (NCDMs).</purpose> 15 <supplinf>The data are from the New Mexico Birth Defects and Surveillance System (NM BDPASS). In January 2000 birth defects became a reportable condition; however, birth defects were collected prior to this date. The first year of consistent data is 1998. However, data for upper limb deficiencies were not collected consistently until 2004. The most recent year of analyzed data is 2007. Data are collected on births occurring in-state to NM residents. We do not currently receive births for NM residents which occur out of state. NM BDPASS collects birth defect data among live births as well as fetal losses, which include stillbirths, spontaneous abortions and elective terminations occurring at all gestational ages. Birth defect cases are ascertained up to age 4; however, the majority of diagnoses are made by age 1. Surveillance methods include a combination of active and passive case ascertainment. Case finding/identification occurs through review of birth and death certificates, hospital discharge diagnoses, records from pediatric specialists and prenatal diagnostic providers. The birth defects coding system is ICD-9-CM, supplemented with the CDC-BPA coding system for specific diagnoses. The following ICD-9-CM codes were used to identify upper limb deficiencies: 755.20-755.29. 16 In 1987, CDC put forth a set of 6 digit codes (the sixth digit provides greater specificity for diagnosis) based on the British Pediatric Association Classification of Diseases and the ICD-9-CM. If CDC/BPA codes are present, the following were used to identify upper limb deficiencies: 755.200-755.290.</supplinf> 15 <supplinf>The data are from the New Mexico Birth Defects and Surveillance System (NM BDPASS). In January 2000 birth defects became a reportable condition; however, birth defects were collected prior to this date. The first year of consistent data is 1998. However, data for upper limb deficiencies were not collected consistently until 2004. The most recent year of analyzed data is 2019. Data are collected on births occurring in-state to NM residents. We do not currently receive births for NM residents which occur out of state. NM BDPASS collects birth defect data among live births as well as fetal losses, which include stillbirths, spontaneous abortions and elective terminations occurring at all gestational ages. Birth defect cases are ascertained up to age 4; however, the majority of diagnoses are made by age 1. Surveillance methods include a combination of active and passive case ascertainment. Case finding/identification occurs through review of birth and death certificates, hospital discharge diagnoses, records from pediatric specialists and prenatal diagnostic providers. 16 The following International Classification of Diseases, 9th and 10th Revisions Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM) codes were used in 2015 to identify upper limb deficiencies (lower and upper limbs combined): 755.2-755.4 and Q71.0-Q71.9, Q72.0-Q72.9, Q73.0-Q73.8, respectively. Only ICD-10-CM code was used from 2016-2019. 17 In 1987, CDC put forth a set of 6 digit codes (the sixth digit provides greater specificity for diagnosis) based on the British Pediatric Association Classification of Diseases and the ICD-9-CM. If CDC/BPA codes are present, the following were used to identify upper limb deficiencies: 755.20-755.49.</supplinf> 17 18 </descript> 18 19 <timeperd> 19 20 <timeinfo> 20 21 <rngdates> 21 <begdate>20 040101</begdate>22 <begdate>20150101</begdate> 22 23 <begtime/> 23 <enddate>20 071231</enddate>24 <enddate>20191231</enddate> 24 25 <endtime/> 25 26 </rngdates> … … 54 55 <theme> 55 56 <themekt>ICD-9-CM</themekt> 56 <themekey>755.20-755.29</themekey> 57 <themekey>755.2-755.4</themekey> 58 <themekey/> 59 </theme> 60 <theme> 61 <themekt>ICD-10-CM</themekt> 62 <themekey>Q71.0-Q71.9, Q72.0-Q72.9, Q73.0-Q73.8</themekey> 57 63 <themekey/> 58 64 </theme> … … 76 82 <city>Santa Fe</city> 77 83 <state>NM</state> 78 <postal>8750 2</postal>84 <postal>87505</postal> 79 85 <country>United States Of America</country> 80 86 </cntaddr> … … 101 107 <procstep> 102 108 <procdesc>Dataset developed per the instructions found in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Recommendations for Nationally Consistent Data and Measures within the Environmental Public Health Tracking Network, version 1.3, (http://ephtracking.cdc.gov/docs/CDC_NCDM_Pt1_1.3.pdf). </procdesc> 103 <procdate>201 10607</procdate>109 <procdate>20160203</procdate> 104 110 </procstep> 105 111 <procstep> … … 129 135 rgis.unm.edu) or other servers hosted at UNM Earth Data Analysis Center. 130 136 </procdesc> 131 <procdate>201 20417</procdate>137 <procdate>20170920</procdate> 132 138 </procstep></lineage> 133 139 </dataqual> … … 156 162 <city>Santa Fe</city> 157 163 <state>NM</state> 158 <postal>8750 2</postal>164 <postal>87505</postal> 159 165 <country>United States Of America</country> 160 166 </cntaddr> … … 175 181 </distinfo> 176 182 <metainfo> 177 <metd>20 110607</metd>183 <metd>20210914</metd> 178 184 <metc> 179 185 <cntinfo> … … 188 194 <city>Santa Fe</city> 189 195 <state>NM</state> 190 <postal>8750 2</postal>196 <postal>87505</postal> 191 197 <country>United States Of America</country> 192 198 </cntaddr> … … 200 206 </cntinfo> 201 207 </metc> 202 <metstdn>EPHTN Tracking Network Profile Version 1.2</metstdn>208 <metstdn>EPHTN Tracking Network Profile Version 3.0</metstdn> 203 209 <metac>None</metac> 204 210 <metuc>None</metuc>
Note: See TracChangeset
for help on using the changeset viewer.